{{item.title}}
{{item.text}}
{{item.title}}
{{item.text}}
Environmental crime is an illegal act which directly harms the environment and encompasses a wide range of actions that endanger the environment, human health, or both. Its defining characteristic is having an impact on the environment. This impact is visible in rising pollution levels, deterioration of the wildlife, decline in biodiversity and disruption of the ecological equilibrium.
Environmental crimes are not victimless. The harm they cause to ecosystems increases the risk of sickness, environmental catastrophe and irreversible climate change. It also lowers life expectancy and increases the probability of human death.1
In general, the most common types of environmental crimes are:
Wildlife crime - which can be understood as illegal trading in endangered species
Illegal mining - smuggling of ozone-depleting substances
Pollution crimes - illegal trading in hazardous materials and trash disposal
Illegal fishing - fishing that is unreported, unregulated, and unlawful
Illegal logging and trafficking in stolen timber
As environmental crimes are a growing concern, an urgent need exists to make criminal law more effective at protecting the environment. Independent countries as well as international organizations are implementing new laws in order to combat climate change and environmental degradation as it poses a real threat to the world.
According to the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), such acts are a very lucrative criminal activity that produce between USD 110 and 281 billion in illegal revenues per year. They also cause the loss of tax revenues of the countries. Only for illegal logging it is estimated to total between USD 6 and 9 billion per year.3
As a way to combat this type of illegal activity and it’s ML/TF risk, environmental crime has been added to the list of predicate offenses for money laundering in European Union 6th Directive on Anti-Money Laundering, which is the latest in a series of legislative efforts by the EU to harmonize and enhance the bloc’s ability to tackle financial crime within and across member states.4
Firstly, as the majority of illegal activities, environmental crime brings huge financial profit. Financial flows from this kind of crime are estimated to amount to hundreds of billions of dollars per year: illegal wildlife trade 7–23 billion USD, forestry crimes 51–152 billion USD, illegal fisheries 11–24 billion USD, Illegal mining 12–48 billion USD; waste 10–12 billion USD.5
Secondly, this type of crime is relatively low-risk due to lack of financial scrutiny and low penalties in this domain.6 In the financial sector there is still low awareness of the connection between this type of crime and ML/TF and, as a result, only few financial institutions have methods to counteract the financial activities connected to green crimes.7 There have also been very few financial investigations in this matter historically.6
We can observe that the situation has begun to change in the last few years and the organizations operating in the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-terrorist financing sector (AML/CFT) have started implementing the necessary tools and actions.
As an example, in 2022 the Basel AML Index added environmental crime data to its indicators of money laundering and terrorist financing.8 This indicator has 5% weighting and is based on the Global Organized Crime Index, measuring risks connected to environmental crimes and first published in 2021.9
FinCEN (Financial Crimes Enforcement Network), also in 2021, issued a notice titled “FinCEN Calls Attention to Environmental Crimes and Related Financial Activity” where the environmental crimes were described and required to be reported.10
The banks (Financial Institutions) play an important role here, as they are part of international trade through provided services. They should therefore be aware of the risks and implement necessary instruments to detect financial flows connected to these crimes.10
To better understand the indicators of environmental crime it is important to know its supply chain. ECOFELS’s (The Egmont Centre of FIU Excellence and Leadership) report6 provide the following Actors Supply Chain for Wildlife Crime:
Poachers – capture the species
Runners/brokers - purchase product from the poacher
Intermediaries – provide logistics solutions
Exporters/Importers – move product between regions
Wholesalers – distribute purchased product in destination country
Retail traders – sale finished product
Naturally, the attention should focus on the industries which are directly connected to environmental crimes such as: timber and wildlife trade, mining and other natural resources extraction, gem and precious metal trade7 and also scraps and secondhand goods companies – which can be used for waste trafficking.10
However, there are other industries which could take part, consciously or unconsciously, in the illegal activity: financial intermediaries, law and accountancy companies, logistics and transportation companies.10
In line with the recommendation of the Basel Committee to include sustainability principles in the areas of credit risk measurement and management, many banks already include sustainability risks in their customer credit risk management procedures and carry out sustainability due diligence.10
It contains best practices and case studies submitted by 40 counties, such as “recommending countries do not dismiss the threat or prevalence of environmental crimes based on their home country's reliance on, or availability of, natural resources, ensuring those with AML/CTF regulatory authority or responsibility have the tools and training to identify, report, and stop environmental crimes, and encouraging public-private partnership.”7
In the same report, FATF distinguishes several indicators of environmental crime, such as:
FATF also recommended to assess business activities that may be related to various environmental crimes included in the enterprise-wide risk assessment, review risk factors related to business products or services, customer base and jurisdictions to strengthen internal controls and risk mitigation framework, and work with the public sector and civil society to share awareness and maintain an up-to-date understanding of the typology of crime and threats.7
Check out other publications in the “Transaction Monitoring” series:
The proposal:
Utilizing the AML framework offers a chance to more effectively prosecute perpetrators of crimes against wildlife, as AML laws often trigger higher penalties than environmental or wildlife crime.
"In 2016, the Australian Border Force (ABF) intercepted several outgoing international mail parcels containing native wildlife. Together with several intercepted inbound packages containing exotic wildlife they were linked to an Australian person of interest (POI).”(6) Financial intelligence took part in identifying the broader criminal networks.
“Bank transaction information obtained from the FIU linked the primary POI directly to several Swedish wildlife traffickers, supporting the criminal investigation. Likewise, FIU analysis identified that the same Swedish entities had been sending funds to another Australian reptile trader.”6
The primary person of interest was convicted on six charges including: attempting to export regulated native specimens, importing of regulated live specimens, possession of illegally imported specimens and money laundering.
Additionally, the person was sentenced to 4 years in prison.
On the basis of recommendations and new regulations, as well as experience of financial intelligence units, the possibilities of alerting systems can be continuously improved.
Proper due diligence and transaction monitoring of our customers' transactions, gives us a chance to detect crimes against the environment more effectively.
Sources:
https://www.europol.europa.eu/crime-areas-and-statistics/crime-areas/environmental-crime
https://www.unodc.org/documents/NGO/EIA_Ecocrime_report_0908_final_draft_low.pdf
FATF (July 2021) - MONEY LAUNDERING FROM ENVIRONMENTAL CRIMES https://www.fatf-gafi.org/content/fatf-gafi/en/publications/Environmentalcrime/Money-laundering-from-environmental-crime.html
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32018L1673
UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme) (2016) - The rise of environmental crime: A growing threat to natural resources peace, development and security https://wedocs.unep.org/handle/20.500.11822/7662;jsessionid=03828D601A5503DD20247827CF3F8854
ECOFEL (January 2021) - FINANCIAL INVESTIGATIONS INTO WILDLIFE CRIME https://egmontgroup.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/2021_ECOFEL_-_Financial_Investigations_into_Wildlife_Crime.pdf
ACAMS (2021) - GREEN CRIME: RE-THINKING HOW FINANCIAL CRIME STRATEGIES APPLY TO ENVIRONMENTAL CRIME https://www.acams.org/pt-br/media/document/23436
https://www.acamstoday.org/green-crimes-and-sustainable-trade-finance/
Environmental Crime - European Commission https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/policies/justice-and-fundamental-rights/criminal-justice/environmental-crime_en
Partner, Financial Crime Unit, PwC Poland
Director, Financial Crime Unit, PwC Poland